“Neo-Humanist” statement calls for a global parliament

 

The need to develop “transnational planetary institutions to cope with global problems” is one of sixteen main principles included in a statement that was published recently by Paul Kurtz and other prominent humanists. According to the "Neo-Humanist Statement of Secular Principles and Values", "all members of the planetary community" are "ethically obligated" to "transcend the arbitrary political boundaries of the past and help create new transnational institutions that are democratic in governance and will respect and defend human rights." The document states that these new transnational institutions “will need to adopt a body of laws which will apply worldwide, a legislature to enact and revise these laws, a world court to interpret them, and an elected executive body to apply them.”

Drafted the statement: Paul Kurtz

Image: Wikimedia

The document that includes a call for an “eventual World Parliament” is signed by more than 100 well-known humanists including former U.S. Congresswoman Patricia Schroeder, Harvard psychologist Steven Pinker, writer Ann Druyan as well as philosophers Rebecca Goldstein, Colin McGinn, Philip Kitcher and Owen Flanagan.

The statement is the latest public declaration of a humanist movement that has been shaped by similar documents in 1933, 1973, and 2000. It is not the first to endorse the notion of a world parliament. The “Humanist Manifesto 2000” that was published ten years ago already elaborated extensively on the need for “new planetary institutions.” Among other things it stated that “we need now more than ever a world body that represents the people of the world rather than nation-states.” The statement concluded that “perhaps a bicameral legislature is the most feasible with both a Parliament of peoples and a General Assembly of nations.”

The new “Neo-Humanist” statement was issued in March of this year, apparently in the context of a schism that is ongoing in the humanist movement. According to the website of the newly established “Institute for Science and Human Values” that is chaired by Paul Kurtz, one of the leading figures in the humanist movement for over 30 years, the statement “will help guide the new organization’s activities.”

 

The Weekly E-Book Reading List - 9/24/2011

Superheroes: The Best of Philosophy and Pop Culture edited by William Irwin

Alex’s Review: by Alex Knapp, Contributing Author

As appeared in Forbes Magazine

This is a compilation of the “best of” essays from the various superhero books in the Blackwell Philosophy and Pop Culture series. I’ve read a few books like this and have a couple on the shelves. Being a fan of both superheroes and philosophy, it wasn’t hard to like this book. For me, though, there were three standout essays, two of which were both by Professor Mark D. White, aka the Comics Professor. The first is “Captain America and the Virtue of Modesty” by Mark D. White, which explores how modesty and honesty can be reconciled, especially for someone with superpowers. The other White essay that I really enjoyed was “Why Doesn’t Batman Kill the Joker?” which is an excellent analysis the the issue from both utilitarian and deontological perspectives. It even managed to use the Trolley Problem in a way that didn’t make me want to throw the Kindle across the room. (For the record, I consider the Trolley Problem to be one of the most ridiculous, pointless, unenlightening thought experiments in ethical philosophy. I should write an essay on that one day.)

But for me, the gem of the book was the essay “Does Peter Parker Have a Good Life?” by Neil Mussett, which explores the question of the Meaning of Life in the context of Spider-Man, using viewpoints from the secular humanist Paul Kurtz, Objectivist Ayn Rand, Stoic Epictetus, Psychologist Viktor Frankl and Saint Thomas Aquinas. It’s a really fabulous read and one of the best pop culture/philosophy essays I’ve read, period.

All in all, it was a really fun read. And best of all, right now it’s free!

 

 

 

 

© Institute for Science and Human Values